Do it... I BELIEVE in you..
+rep
+rep known since day 2 on server, he has great potential
Fin your 2nd day on the server was also my 2nd day both server and game I just started playing at that time after I saw Nylex's videos I got interested in playing the game again and the fact you and the 2 others (Neti, Dansed) were my first friends in game and team, without you guys I'm nothing from the start, didn't reach this far without u all.
+rep You really should be staff adaza.
Thank you to all of you who have vouched and gave me a positive feedback on my application I really appreciate it and happy new year to you all!
Denied.
I cri, lol.
Denied.
Denied what reasons?
This really annoys me how you just come and state "Denied" on any app any report any ban appeal but you give no reasons for why it is denied.
With staff applications I do not believe a reason has to be justified, though I may be a bit of a biased source. A reason also wouldn't change the verdict, it would still be denied. Usually all of these staff application denials are decisions made by the staff team as a whole, but I am a tad peeved that all of us but Rawr were left out of the decision. It likely wouldn't have changed the verdict but I do not like to see staff applications denied without being included in the vote.
I view a blunt rejection like this as a negative thing for a few reasons.
-Whatever you think of Hitmans potential of being a good moderator, he clearly put effort in his application.
He is also one of the few active persons on the server who puts a lot of effort in making the pub server(s) a place where it's fun to be.
If he is not what you look for it would be nice for wannabe mods to know what the character traits are that your looking for in a mod.
A win might be that when we (forum visitors) get a motivation on why someone is rejected it wil stop the bulk of applications, concisting of not much more then
"Im social, good at the game and hate KOS", appearing on the forums.
I view a blunt rejection like this as a negative thing for a few reasons.
-Whatever you think of Hitmans potential of being a good moderator, he clearly put effort in his application.
He is also one of the few active persons on the server who puts a lot of effort in making the pub server(s) a place where it's fun to be.
If he is not what you look for it would be nice for wannabe mods to know what the character traits are that your looking for in a mod.
A win might be that when we (forum visitors) get a motivation on why someone is rejected it wil stop the bulk of applications, concisting of not much more then
"Im social, good at the game and hate KOS", appearing on the forums.
Crazy bob, I appreciate your views on this, however the staff team ALWAYS makes decisions on a staff application as a team. For Hitman, we all denied it because we, as different staff members reject his application for different reasons, however as a single unit we deny it simply because of one or two common reasons. We don't disclose these reasons because if we did it would be hella easy for some person to take that into account and completely change his/her behaviour only to become a staff member and that would result in swarming of untrustworthy people which we do not want.
I view a blunt rejection like this as a negative thing for a few reasons.
-Whatever you think of Hitmans potential of being a good moderator, he clearly put effort in his application.
He is also one of the few active persons on the server who puts a lot of effort in making the pub server(s) a place where it's fun to be.
If he is not what you look for it would be nice for wannabe mods to know what the character traits are that your looking for in a mod.
A win might be that when we (forum visitors) get a motivation on why someone is rejected it wil stop the bulk of applications, concisting of not much more then
"Im social, good at the game and hate KOS", appearing on the forums.
Crazy bob, I appreciate your views on this, however the staff team ALWAYS makes decisions on a staff application as a team. For Hitman, we all denied it because we, as different staff members reject his application for different reasons, however as a single unit we deny it simply because of one or two common reasons. We don't disclose these reasons because if we did it would be hella easy for some person to take that into account and completely change his/her behaviour only to become a staff member and that would result in swarming of untrustworthy people which we do not want.
This would be exactly the reason to have a reason why, so that person knows what he can work on, if there's something lacking. Perhaps it was a near miss or a total failure. Just a blunt "denied" on a relative busy forum post is rather... confusing for the author itself. I had the same thing, yet no reason apart from a bullshit accusation. It's better to at least lift the curtain a little bit, so he can work on it even if he's not running for staff anymore.
I view a blunt rejection like this as a negative thing for a few reasons.
-Whatever you think of Hitmans potential of being a good moderator, he clearly put effort in his application.
He is also one of the few active persons on the server who puts a lot of effort in making the pub server(s) a place where it's fun to be.
If he is not what you look for it would be nice for wannabe mods to know what the character traits are that your looking for in a mod.
A win might be that when we (forum visitors) get a motivation on why someone is rejected it wil stop the bulk of applications, concisting of not much more then
"Im social, good at the game and hate KOS", appearing on the forums.
Crazy bob, I appreciate your views on this, however the staff team ALWAYS makes decisions on a staff application as a team. For Hitman, we all denied it because we, as different staff members reject his application for different reasons, however as a single unit we deny it simply because of one or two common reasons. We don't disclose these reasons because if we did it would be hella easy for some person to take that into account and completely change his/her behaviour only to become a staff member and that would result in swarming of untrustworthy people which we do not want.
This would be exactly the reason to have a reason why, so that person knows what he can work on, if there's something lacking. Perhaps it was a near miss or a total failure. Just a blunt "denied" on a relative busy forum post is rather... confusing for the author itself. I had the same thing, yet no reason apart from a bullshit accusation. It's better to at least lift the curtain a little bit, so he can work on it even if he's not running for staff anymore.
"It's better to at least lift the curtain a little bit, so he can work on it even if he's not running for staff anymore. " Other people are, Opti. And it is really easy for them to observe other people that apply, and watch them get denied then wait for the reason as to WHY its denied. Why? Let's say that when THEY make an application they will know that "oh adaza did this wrong, he fucked up here and thats why he got denied" and then they would clearly avoid making that mistake in their character/application. Thus in a way it's easy to 'fool' us if we give out detailed pointers as to WHY a staff application was declined. Anyway, point taken. Lets end this here.
+1 for me :DDD
+1 for me :DDD
Could you please stop commenting on these old posts and bringing them up again.
Rawr do it you pussy https://gyazo.com/a65d24afbc1467013ac7bf4f7128dbb0 :DD I'm waiting rofl
Latest Post: FrederickTheAverage ban Appeal (I DIDINT BAN EVADE ON GOD) Our newest member: LeBGdu73 Recent Posts Unread Posts
